Jonathan Haidt Stole My Stolen Idea

Here I am, lying in bed, reading a book on moral psychology on a tablet like a modern man. And then this!

I find it ironic that liberals generally embrace Darwin and reject “intelligent design” as the explanation for design and adaptation in the natural world, but they don’t embrace Adam Smith as the explanation for design and adaptation in the economic world.  (Kindle Locations 5371-5375)

WAS THIS BOOK EVEN IN MANUSCRIPT FORM WHEN I WROTE THIS:

If I can appreciate the economics notion that order can emerge spontaneously “as the product human action but not of human design,” surely I can appreciate evolution’s notion that nature’s complexities can emerge without a designer (and vice versa). Yet many, even vaunted members of the scientific academy, accept one and not the other.

How righteous was Mr. Haidt's mind after he read my blog and decided to rip me off without giving me credit! Clearly his 'rider' is justifying his 'elephant' trampling propriety into dust!

Don't understand that last sentence?

Well you have to read the book to understand it!

And you should.

BECAUSE IT'S REALLY GOOD!!!

GAH